Archive for July, 2009

Is the web all about sex?

Tuesday, July 14th, 2009
VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

flowerbee

Ever since I wrote the post about the future trend of adultery more than half of my Google ads on my mainpage have been somehow related to dating or sex. There has been a plentiful of offers to meet and marry Asian, Chinese, Baltic, East-European, Moldovian and ladies of other origins. Relationship advice is also offered, which kind of completes the picture. Examples can be seen here (with some luck, ultimately it depends on Google):

There seems to be an abundance of this kind of ads. In principle I have nothing against this, specially now that Google seems to be getting the ads right on my single post pages (it used to put dating ads even to posts about environment). However, it did make me wonder about the question on how much is the web about sex, or more generally, somehow related to sex.

Most of the searches about the issue lead to this article by Cecil Adams who asked that very same question but concentrating purely on pornography. It was written in 2005, and the conclusion was that there are plenty of other things in the web besides porn (according to some estimates mentioned in the article it presented less than 1% share of all the webpages). In another, more recent (2008) article Tom Chatfield took a look on a list of the world’s most popular sites and was already wondering whether to declare cyberporn dead.

On the other hand, there are evidence pointing to the other direction as well. Middle East’s and North Africa’s web-traffic for example have been said to be very much sex-related (articles here (Wired 2001) and here (Afrol 2006(?)), former more outdated than the latter), some of the estimates put the figure at 80%. Whatever the truth is, I would imagine the situation to be roughly similar elsewhere. Furthermore, Adams mentions in his text that at the time of writing search word “sex” gave 214 million pages in Google. Now the figure is at (somewhat ironically) 699 million, meaning it has more than tripled. Then again, in the web, what hasn’t?

The thing that makes the estimation even more difficult is that even though related, it is still one thing what people search for and another what kinds of websites are out there. Google Trends provides some help by showing that “sex” is still one of the most popular search words in the web, even though there has not been much change for years. “Porn” on the other hand has been rising in popularity and was almost as popular as “sex” (because of the crisis perhaps..). Personally I was able to find only one searchword (“Facebook”) that was more popular than the two.

However, even this does not tell us the whole truth. Searches done with the word “sex” might also refer to other things. Vice versa, people might look for sexually explicit content by using other words than “sex”. Furthermore, sex can be also disquised in the sense it can be used in ads etc. in pages and sites that are not considered to be have nothing to do with sex. People who surf around Flickr might do so to find pictures of pretty girls instead of beautiful scenery. Ultimately, it can be very difficult to define which page, visit or search is really “sex-related”.

In any case, it seems safe to say that sex in all of its forms maintains a very strong position in the web.  No matter how much we embrace the web as a solution to many of the big and small problems we face today, it also reflects our more primitive functions as well. Following the idea of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, before moving into solving those bigger problems we need to satisfy the more basic needs first. Apparently the web helps us to meet those needs. That might also be the reason why a bit under 40% of Americans would rather choose to have no sex for two weeks than to give up their Internet access for the same period; by giving up Internet you actually end up giving both, the Internet and the sex.

The answer why sex will never disappear from the net also lies there (even though some may wish so). Sex is too much in us, for obvious reasons, and the web provides such a convinient tool to get one’s hands on it. Eventually, that is all the internet is, a tool to share information (understood here in the broadest sense of the term). If it is education or knowledge that we search, it is very much out there in the web. If it is sex, there is no shortage of that either.

So far it seems to be more the latter. It might be a question of maturing, but in the end no matter how educated or civilised, we, or at least many of us, cannot completely forget that more biological side of us. Then again, as long as no one gets hurt or injured, why should we? In any case, I would still be interested to know how much of the internet traffic or sites are sex related. Thus, if there is anyone out there who has a clue or wants to throw in his/her 2 cents, please do so by leaving a comment.

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Lost posts, found posts

Friday, July 10th, 2009
VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

page_not_found1

I quess it is bound to happen to everyone who blogs, and yes, it happened to me 2 days back. My hosting company had some problems with their servers (I wonder if it had something to do with the Attack on US and South Korean Websites), and due to that they lost data, including some of mine. They were able to recover the data one week back, but had nothing after that since I had not sign up for more frequent backup package, which they kindly offered me during this lost-data incident (there is something bothering about that: they lose my data, and offer a better package for the next time this happens.. is this bound to happen on a more frequent basis?). In sum, I lost one post entirely (“Ranking Green Electronics“) and another one partially (“FuTrends2: Adultery is OK“, the draft was there), and all the changes I had made to my blog during the week, which, needless to say, were not that little.

Yesterday I started collecting the bits and pieces of those lost posts, and was able to find some from Technorati and similars (my own backup was two weeks old and I write my posts directly to the blog, not to Word document etc. first). I also went through the cache of my Firefox, but did not really understand how to use it, and furthermore, it seemed to have only the files from the day before, during which the site had been completely down. Today I decided to google the issue to see if someone had any suggestions how to recover the files, and was pleased to see that this was the case.

It was the very Google and it’s cache that came to the rescue with the posts. I was able to find the instructions from the blogs called the Cookblog and WordPress Hacker (many thanks to both). The latter also told me how to use the Firefox cache for the same operation, even though in this case it was not that much help. In addition to being able to completely recover the other, I was also able to use Google with the other post. Even though the page of the post had not been indexed and cached entirely, it showed some pieces of the post in the search results (why so I do not know… maybe it had indexed my index page when the post was published..?). From there onwards I just tried to remember which words I had been using in the post, do searches by using those words and collect the pieces of frases Google provided with the search results. It was like making a puzzle.

I am not sure with the other post if I was able to put it all together, I am still wondering whether i am missing a paragraph or two. In any case, this experience showed also how difficult it can be to define the line between data gathering and privacy issues. I am not too keen on Google keeping my personal information but in this case I sure did not mind it having my lost page(s) cached. The two things are quite different (even though when you lost one a blog post seems to be the most precious thing in the world), but there are cases where the distinction is not that clear. I am all for privacy, and understand the risks involved, but sometimes it is just so nice and convenient to find data restored somewhere you did not even expect it to be.

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Ranking Green Electronics

Friday, July 10th, 2009
VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Greenpeace has been publishing this “Guide to Greener Electronics ” for 3 years or so, where they rank the leading manufacturers of consumer electronics according to their stance and actions on toxic chemicals, recycling and climate change. I see it is an excellent example on how to provide consumers information that will help them to make  more enlightened consumer decisions. The info Greenpeace provides is the kind you will not be able to find from the typical tech magazines or websites, very seldom enviromental friendliness gets named as one of the criterias in the evaluation of this and that gadget.

Greenpeace also presents its findings in a very simple and understandable way (see image above), no need to go through hundred-page reports and hold a degree in physics in order to see which ones are good and which ones bad. Sure, that might mean that we will miss some aspects and the reasons behind them, but the ranking gives us a some perspective to the issue. In addition, taking Greenpeace’s fame I find the data they provide reliable, at least in the sense that the organisation does not have a reputation on being soft on the companies or favoring one over the other.

I do not know how much influence the listing has. For what it is worth, the only reason why I have not bought Nintendo‘s Wii is the position of the company in this ranking. However, I seem to be in the minority, despite the crisis Nintendo is making record profits. It is a bit of a shame, I find consumer activism one of the most efficient ways to get companies to change their policies to the better direction. However, if their is no activism, that is, people do not really care, then it is of little use. The consumer that is not enlightened is, well, only a consumer.

I suppose a little more publicity would not hurt either. The ranking always gets noticed in Finland, thanks to Nokia‘s position in the top. However, I have not really come across the news in any of the major news agencies (BBC did cover it last year though),  even though green topics in general seem to be very popular at the moment. It is possible that I have just missed them, but I was wondering could the reason be Greenpeace’s controversial reputation? If so, I find it a little bit odd. At least in this context, I find no reason for Greenpeace not to be objective. Then again, maybe it is the other way, maybe it is the big media that has become too close to the leading companies in the bottom of the ranking.

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

FuTrends2: Adultery is OK

Friday, July 10th, 2009
VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

tomato

One Taiwanese told me once about a friend of his who lived in the more rural areas of Taiwan. One day this friend, who back then still was in his teens, had invited his girlfriend to his house. The parents of the boy were also at home, but when they realized that the young couple had spent few moments in the boy’s room without supervision, the boy and the girl were forced to marry each other. This was not only the wish of the boy’s parents, also the girl’s parents agreed. Nothing at all had happened in the room, yet the whole idea that something could have happened was enough to seal the matrimony between the two.

To many of us the story sounds almost untrue (which I suppose might also be the case). However, this does not only tell us that there are still people that take the matter of sex and marriage very seriously, but also that many of us take it less and less seriously. On the other end of the scale, adultery is coming more and more commonplace. This is not purely a Western phenomenon, in addition to countries like the UK (news here) adultery is also gaining ground for example in Uganda (news here) and Malaysia (news here). It has also become a lot easier, thanks to websites such as IllicitEncounters.com or The Ashley Madison Agency. Furthermore, at least in the UK it does not take long for the extramarital relacions to appear, according to a 2005 survey one in seven newlyweds cheated in the first year of the marriage.

The obvious question is naturally why? As said before, the web makes it all so much easier, but that does not really explain the reasons behind it. In the case of men, who tend to be more “simple” in their sexual behaviour (see here the anecdote between men cheating and eating a chocolate cake), supposedly some part of the blame can be given to the TV, media and society as a whole. Everything is much more out there on display. But it is not just the men who cheat (otherwise they would be cheating the women by themselves), also women find their way into someone else’s bed more than before.

That is also the reason why the biological explanation fails. For men it could be argued that “evolutionally” it makes sense to try to “spread the seed” with as many women as possible and hence, cheat. However, when it comes to women, adultery does not make much sense from the purely evolutionary point of view (at least nothing comes into my mind right now). Furthermore, evolution/”biological changes” take thousands of years, this development has been much more rapid and recent.

Therefore it must be something that has changed in the society. If nothing else, the attitude of “carpe diem”, enjoy life and “must experience all” has been taking over. Sex is also becoming less of a deeply emotional thing between two persons and more a pleasent passtime, something people enjoy and find excitement, much the same way as going to an amusement park. Furthermore, why go everytime to the same amusement park, especially if you happen to be nearby another one which looks different, new and exciting?

Therefore, the linkage between sex and marriage is also getting weaker. Nowadays it is normal for the couples to do things with other people (men or women), such as sports, hobbies or anything their own couple is not so fond of doing with them. There are plenty of women and some men who go for example dancing with other men/women cause their own partner simply does not like dancing, and this is seen as completely ok.

Within 10-20 years the same is likely to apply to sex as well. If you don’t really hit it off in the bed with your own boy or girlfriend, it will be accepted to every now and then go to the bed of someone else. It is nothing personal, it is like a hobby you enjoy. Moreover, if there is someone who is known to be an excellent lover, there will be nothing wrong in trying that out, just as you would like to try the food of someone known to be a really good cook.

Once distanced from its sexual origin, marriage will also change, and in some cases it becomes a union of friends instead of lovers. In these cases marriage will no longer be about two persons swearing fidelity and love towards each other, it is about two friends deciding to be friends forever (while having other friends as well), and committing to take care of each others and spend their lives together and avoiding lonelyness. Marriage of this kind says nothing about being loyal in the sexual sense. Having sex in a marriage like that is like going to have coffee with your friend, you can do it with anyone you want, as long as you follow certain mutually accepted principles (safe sex etc.). Children will also be born in these marriages, it is just that  it will be seen better to be raised up by two friends than by a fighting couple.

Naturally, somethings will not change. Jealousy is likely to raise its head in the new kinds of relationships as well. Cheating will still bring pain for the other one, especially if it had not been agreed on and truely accepted beforehand. It is just that adultery in general will lose much of its current meaning. It becomes normalized in a sense that it won’t for example serve as a reason to end otherwise more or less functioning relationship. Furthermore, due to the social and institutional changes in the meaning of marriage, new forms of families are also likely to form. Instead of just a dad and a mom one might even have a whole group of parents. In a family of 3 moms and 4 fathers, just imagine the children.

Adultery is OK: Do you find this trend likely?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)